She has grown incredibly popular on Instagram, with more than , passionate followers. She started the Sea of shoe blog in at the ripe age of fifteen, merely documenting her outfits of the day. On Popular Bio, She is one of the successful Blogger. She has ranked on the list of those famous people who were born on December 23, She is one of the Richest Blogger who was born in Texas. She also has a position among the list of Most popular bloggers. Jane Aldridge is 1 of the famous people in our database with the age of 27 years old.
She earned the money being a professional blogger. She is from Texas. I think Jane and her mom should really think about hiring a PR firm, as they seemed to have been blindsided about how the Texas Monthly article would be perceived. And Jane appearing on a news show with the author did her no favors when she later tried to assert the numbers were exaggerated and quotes were out of context and incorrectly accused NY Mag of the wrongdoing.
Jane is a very successful, and incredibly beautiful, girl. Interviews come and go and what is stunningly apparent to me at least is an inept, unprofessional quasi-journalist who chose to edit an interview and intersperse a whole ton of himself into the angry denials. Jane was used. The veracity and intentions of interviewers are not all at a high level. On the other hand, yay for a tad of controversy and when there is the substance of a gorgeous intelligent blogger from a very good family, yay for the ratings upsurge.
The moral of the story is to know that your innocent words can be wrenched this way and that and unless you insist upon approval for facts, you are at the mercy of a press as likely to be screeching for controversy as a true journalist. Love Jane and bloggers, I hope, unite against the assault of a headline-grabbing swarm quasi-journalist. I have to say that I am not overly familiar with Jane or her blog, but at face value, this sounds like a classic case of twisting words to make a good story.
I have seen a lot of this revolving around a charity organization as well. Lots of people out to tear each other down. If she is well off, it can give her a leg up on other bloggers in order to showcase more pieces in her writing, but who would turn that down?
That being said, no one should feel or act superior due to their monetary privileges. Hopefully this all blows over and she can show a humble and appreciative side to her audience.
They could get sued. If people want to read it and like her, they can continue doing so. I personally find it more inspiring to see what outfit someone can create from much less. I personally think that Jane has done herself no favours. But Sheeler is not responsible for that.
He wrote a great profile, and is standing by his work and the work of his publication. I stopped reading her 2 years ago. She has never seemed very interested in her audience at all, and still seems pretty detached from the give and take relationship bloggers usually try to foster. Do NOT ask to see an article beforehand.
Saying yes to the press means giving up an element of control—that is just the way it is. Ask about the angle of the piece, and if certain things you say are meant to be off the record, SAY SO ahead of time. Pretending to have been misquoted sometimes comes next but that never helps anything. Sabina, you are right.
Also, Sheeler warned Aldridge that what has happened could happen, she willingly opened her doors to him. She has no cause for complaint. I doubt many of us would pass up an opportunity for exposure akin to such a piece, nor would we deny the importance of start-up capital for these endeavors or decline the offer of it ; it is unfortunate that what could have been such a positive promotion of fashion blogging as a viable enterprise has become mired in such menial squabbles.
Lots of it. I think we like to peek at the lifestyles of the rich and fabulous, then in a torque or jealousy talk trash about them. I suspect this is what happens to poor Jane. A privileged life has privileges but comes with a price. She may be out of touch at times with the tide pool outside her closet, but she sure has a great shoe collection. Tempest in a teapot, indeed. I stopped reading Sea of Shoes a while back for the simple reason that I prefer blogs that are more down-to-earth and relatable for my income; if I want to see what super-rich people are wearing, I can read Vogue.
Her photos are gorgeous, and good for her and her family for making what was clearly a wise investment. There is a huge market for what she does, and there are lots of people in her tax bracket who I assume also enjoy relatability in their blog-reading. I like her. Cate Young and Laura have stated exactly what I was thinking. We all have different incomes, responsibilities, jobs, pants sizes and perspectives. None are better than others; all should be encouraged and respected.
Does that mean I hold it against bloggers like Jane who can? No way. I simply choose to read blogs I relate to. They took direct quotes from the article that was written. Poor Jane… The nature of journalism is to find or create a loud story. Unfortunately, people tend to like controversy so journalists feed them what they want to.
Whether it is true or made up. I feel sad that they put all this dirt all over Jane and her blog. Email example. Closet Jane Aldridge Blogger; seaofshoes. New York. Just look at Leandra Medine, a.
The Man Repeller , whose nuptials swiftly debunked her blog's namesake. But, hey, that don't mean Medine's fem-centric views have shifted or skewed. And when we raided Emily Schuman of Cupcakes and Cashmere's stuff we found no sign of cupcakes or cashmere - but there was a lot of shoes and sparkly things.
0コメント